Racino 2011

The Racino debate is back again at the state legislature as the 2011 session heads towards the finish line. It is one of two issues that are recurring and need to be resolved this session once and for all. The other being the Vikings stadium debate. The reason both keep coming back is they are both important to the state of Minnesota and both have broad bases of support. This is not to say there is not opposition because there is, but much of the opposition in the case of the Racino is working towards their own agenda and needs, not what is best for Minnesota as a whole. The Racino and Vikings stadium situation are not necessarily a package deal although they would seem to be a good fit. Both are beneficial to the state of Minnesota and have legs of their own.

For those who may be unaware the term Racino refers to the addition of slot machines to existing racetracks within Minnesota. The idea has been tried in other states and has been both successful and lucrative.

The idea as mentioned earlier has a broad base of support both amongst legislators and the general public, however it has been held at bay by the money and lobbying efforts of the Minnesota Native American Gaming Lobby. Even though somewhere between 70-80% of the general public wants a bill passed allowing Racinos. Why are the Tribal Gaming lobbyists pushing so hard, it's because they want sole control of the industry. Although adding slots to Canterbury would have no adverse effects on Casinos.

First of all Casinos are spread throughout the state, with most serving areas beyond the reach of proposed Racinos, thus eliminating their influence on current business. Then there is the fact that many people that go to the track prefer that atmosphere. For those people the slots will just add another activity during down time between races and at other times while at the track. This will create revenue that would not otherwise exist under the current system. Also the casinos don't serve beer or other alcohol which is a downside for many prefering a beverage while out having a good time. Both venues have different atmospheres and clientele providing opportunities for all interest levels. It is not a competition, it adds diversity and opportunity for those that would otherwise not participate.

Racino supporters are not targeting existing casino business but looking to expand options for people that prefer life at the track. This would povide excellent revenue streams for the state of Minnesota and would also supplement purses offered for live racing at the track. This would help sustain the Minnesota breeding industry and stop the exodus from Minnesota and also aid in bringing in more competion to strengthen the tracks position nationally. Bottom line is this bill drives revenue and jobs and is not a threat to Native American Gaming which is well entrenched. It will create an estimated $100-125 million annually in revenue for the people of Minnesota.

The sovereignty of the tribes is recognized by Minnesota, nobody is asking for a piece of their pie and they are unwilling to pay taxes on their revenue to prevent the need for Racinos. They should reciprocate and recogonize the sovereignty and right to govern of the state of Minnesota. These revenue streams will also benefit Native American peoples who are tribal members but also vital and respected citizens of Minnesota and the US as well. This is what is best for people of all backgrounds, increasing options and strengthening the overall position of the state of Minnesota.

The Native American Gaming Lobby has recently switched positions on their objections claiming they are looking out for the best interests of the horse racing industry, saying it is a short term fix and it leads to a long term decline in live racing. This is simply not fact as people that go to the track go to see the ponies, it is a fondness, an affection that will not diminish. Americas love of horses has always and will always be there.